History, so it seems, repeats itself.
I was doing some "searching" on Google for a product that I've been anxiously awaiting called "iLoad" - a direct from CD to iPod song importing device.
I don't mean to drag up an old controversy and I especially don't want to seem late to the game on this subject ... but this is high level drama here ...
I typed "iLoad" into the Safari Google Search Toolbar and found this:
Gizmodo Claims iLoad Inventor Jailed
Previously, Gizmodo had done a rather unfavorable intro story on the iLoad:
The iLoad is a little thingie that rips CDs to your iPod. I’m thinking this is a proof-of-concept patent thing for future lawsuits—“PATENT 1,100,033,032,095 - A device that removes data from compact discs and transfers it to a portable music player”— but we’ll see what comes of it.
* I removed some of the wording from the Gizmodo story because I found it rather inflammatory but not defamatory
There was also another post on Gizmodo:
iLoad Inventor and PR Bernie Copeland Give Bad Vibes With PR
So we get a call the other day about the iLoad, which, on the surface, seems, shall we say, "no longer necessary." It's the iLoad PR fella, good guy, it seems. He's going to send us a bit on this new product, all is well, we'll take a look, make a more refined judgement. We see hundreds of ideas like these—on the surface, they're fine. Given a bit of thought, they're kind of silly. More power to the inventor. Yeah, team. Different strokes for different folks.
So I'm not really concerned until the inventor, a certain Sanford B. Schupper, dropped us a line today:
If you want to pontificate or seek self-aggrandizement either go into politics or don’t do it at someone else’s expense. Your business credentials don’t justify such public scathing of something you have no first hand info about. “Think before you speak”...or get a towel and some lotion and head for the bathroom...might be more fulfilling and won’t be at the expense of others.
No need to respond. Just grow up.
So we get flamed over a silly CD player that dumps audio to an iPod with no visible means of getting the CD track info via the Interweb—maybe it's got wireless, or maybe it's vaporware: the website doesn't say—and I'm starting to get a little curious. Why would Mr. Schupper be so angry about this. Could he be making [this] up?
Then I found this story from the Colorado Springs Gazette. The gist appears here:
A Monument businessman convicted of theft and securities fraud won’t be allowed to travel to China to market a product he invented, a judge ruled Friday.
Sanford Schupper, 56, has been convicted of defrauding Citibank Visa of as much as $200,000 and sentenced to six years in prison. In another case, Schupper was convicted of swindling a family out of $872,000 and sentenced to eight years in prison.
Friday, Schupper’s lawyer asked senior state District Court Judge Donald Campbell to grant Schupper permission to go to China to market his latest invention, an accessory for Apple iPods.
So, I decided to find out what had happened since all of this drama took place (that I'm sorry I and possibly some of my regular readers missed).
I decided to email iLoad Customer Service. No response within 48 hours.
I called. No reponse to a voicemail I left in 24 hours.
I called a 2nd time about 32 hours later. The response this time was a returned phone call with a very accusational and odd sounding guy right off the bat.
We spoke for nearly 45 minutes. I asked a couple of questions. He stated the common, "I've never heard of your website". I reminded him of some of the more famous articles I have done here, such as stories on Jack Campbell, Bill Palmer, and the like. He had never heard of Jack Campbell and he had never heard of Bill Palmer. He had heard of iPodGarage (Bill Palmer's site recently changed to the name iProng). Apparently there was a sample or demo deal with Palmer in the works for the iLoad
I am in the process of making a revolutionary iPod peripheral myself. I have spoken to DLO, Griffin and other 3rd party iPod peripheral manufacturers about the product I'm trying to bring to market. I mentioned who I had spoken to, to give me a little bit of "street cred" so I could convey that I knew what I was talking about. I also wanted him to know that I'm intimately involved with the inner workings of the iPod industry. Towards the end of the conversation with Mr. Copeland, the guy who returned my phone call from iLoad, I mentioned the possibility of discussing my peripheral with his company, to kind of see what his reply was.
The reply, "You would still do business with us considering our reputation and the immense damage our name has received on the internet?""
This wasn't the 1st time I had heard this. Mr. Copeland seems to think he's a victim. He and "the people" at Wingspan Investment Partners manufactured a "victim attitude" and he mentioned that when the time is appropriate, he and Wingspan were going to re-evaluate the "Gizmodo damage", but that bringing it up would only serve to further muddy the waters and damage their reputation. I told him, actually, that the Gizmodo article was incomplete and (according to him) inaccurate. Not clarifying it, in my opinion, is slowly but surely sinking in a negative vibe about iLoad.
If products are ever released from iLoad.com certainly word will get back out about the Gizmodo bruhaha. I wanted to clarify the drama so as to help iLoad. I like the concept of the product. But, "the iLoad Team", seems to think that by bringing it up again, it will serve to harm them. Before the conversation on the phone with Mr. Copeland ... I thought my article would help. Now, I have an entirely different opinion of iLoad and Wingspan Investment Partners LLC.
Again, I would like to stress, I thought there was no damage, the only damage that occurred was when the former intellectual property owner (Sanford Schupper) stepped up and ran his mouth.
It just all seemed weird to me ... something wasn't adding up here.
I thought we had ended the conversation rather amicably and with a potential business relationship that might ensue.
This morning I wake up to find a message from the CEO of DLO with small snippets from an email that was sent to him over the weekend. He forwarded me his reply without giving me the exact email Bernie Copeland of Wingspan sent him:
Actually, yes I do know Philip Smith. The name escaped me and I had to jog my memory by looking through some email. He runs a site called jackwhispers.com among other things. I have met with him several times in the past year. Our relationship has been extremely amicable. He has visited our offices, we have discussed some potential business, we have provided him with free DLO product. There is a lot of mutual respect between myself, my company, and Philip. I am very surprised that you would say what you have said below. I have cc’d him on my reply in hopes to get some type of explanation. I really hate “he said, she said” games. I have much more important things to do with work and family.
The DLO CEO included this little snippet from Mr. Copeland's email for me to explain:
By the way, do you know of Philip Smith? He’s trying to spread very “bad stuff” about DLO and yourself. I understand that this is his practice. Something about “Stealing” IP.
Wow, so apparently Bernie Copeland has now engaged in slandering me and potentially trying to hurt my business relationships ... sounds familiar right?
In my phone conversation with Mr. Copeland, I had mentioned that lawsuits amongst iPod developers were common. I asked if he were aware of the DLO suit against Griffin and Griffin's separate suit against a former employee of Griffin who now works for DLO.
The report of public record is pretty much what I delivered verbatim to Mr. Copeland, who oddly wasn't aware of any of the "business" in his own industry.
Here is the reply I sent back to the CEO of DLO:
Looks like we've got another [disaster danger] type on our hands.
I contacted iLoad (Wingspan Investment Partners) a few days back for two reasons.
1) To clear up a story on GIZMODO (see if it reminds you of anything)
2) To see if he may be interested in our product ... being that it seems beyond the scope and product reach of DLO, Griffin, etc at this time ... even though each of you have expressed interest.
I had a conversation with him on Friday ... he was very jumpy and quite honestly, he seemed very shady.
He expressed to me that one does not have to license the dock connector, it is not advantageous ("all that much") to use the "Made for iPod" program, and that they do not have to be a licensed/authorized developer to interface with the iPod. He also expressed that the iLoadC does not have to interface with iTunes over a cell network to put MP3's on an iPod. He said you could interface with MANY other music stores. I didn't know any other music stores worked with the iPOD. Interesting?
I expressed to him that lawsuits are common amongst the 3rd party iPod peripheral market. I mentioned that you had one against Griffin, and Griffin had one against an employee of yours (I told him to Google for details), and as it seems 5-6 are looming in the courts amongst everyone else. I also mentioned the VERY positive relationship I felt [my business partner] and I have with you and [the rest of DLO] and that I just happen to write for and cover Apple Community Drama on my site ... hopefully unbiasly. For him to try and jeopardize that relationship makes me very angry.
This guy is nothing short of a loon. I do not appreciate his trying this stunt.
Again, I have said nothing bad about your company and certainly did not plan to "say bad things about DLO or his company" ... I might change that opinion about his company ... well ... maybe it was already changed and that was the cattle prod.
Thanks for forwarding me this information.
Funny, that he would do this ... and also tell me that I should contact their market rep to set up a meeting to discuss my product.
I also have a very favorable and very unique review of the "DLO Microdock" with a 30 day long term test. Look for it.
Is it possible to send me the full text of his message? He may have slandered me. It seems he certainly did not tell the truth ... I have our entire conversation recorded.
So ... it seems we have a developing story here .... what do you think? Had any of you heard about this controversy?
[UPDATE] Knowing most of the product managers at the "big guy iPod Peripheral Makers" I emailed them a part of this story and asked them to read the rest. One "person" I received word from summed up what "all of the others" have said to me:
"I can confirm his position that he said that he "does not have to work with Apple for connectors and interfaces". In fact, in my conversation with him he said he "talked to Apple and they said that he did not have to be a part of the program". I was very surprised when he said this, because this has never been Apple’s position. And we know first hand."