* photo courtesy of ENgadget
I wanted to wait a while to post information about the the new Intel advertisement controversy.
In case you don't know what I'm talking about ... I'll give you the condensed version.
At MacWorld Expo '06 Apple debuted a new commercial for the new Core Duo iMac & Core Duo Macbook (I still hate the name Macbook).
The first controversy involved Intel not really liking the tone of the commercial. Several websites reported Intel management were upset with the new commercial because it demeaned Intels other clients by saying:
The Intel processor ... for years it's been trapped inside PCs, inside dull little boxes, performing dull little tasks ... (blah blah shortened) ... starting today, the Intel chip will be set free ... to live life inside a Mac"
Some websites even featured interviews with Intel reps ... saying they had no knowledge of the ads.
As reported by C/NET:
Of course, that's not exactly the way Intel would put it.
"Never would we characterize our customers that way," Intel Vice President Deborah Conrad said in an interview.
Conrad said that Intel cooperated with Apple for some particulars of the TV spot, but added, "We didn't know what the end result was going to be."
"It's probably a good thing that we didn't see them earlier," Conrad said.
Turns out, the Intel reps (a vice president of marketing = read as a nobody who could be fired at any moment) who did these interviews had no knowledge that Intel executive management DID KNOW about the ads. Executive management at Intel just didn't trust the loudmouths in the marketing department ... obviously for good reasons.
Many news sources, including C/NET listed the person performing these interviews as an Intel Vice President ... implying she was executive management ... I don't see her on this page
Then, last week a controversy erupted over the ad being an exact copy of a music video done by a relatively unknown band called The Postal Service.
I immediately watched both videos and saw a resemblance ... then I read the Postal Service website:
"It has recently come to our attention that Apple Computers' new television commercial for the Intel chip features a shot-for-shot recreation of our video for 'Such Great Heights' made by the same filmmakers responsible for the original. We did not approve this commercialization and are extremely disappointed with both parties that this was executed without our consultation or consent." -Ben Gibbard, The Postal Service
The intent of this message was to get The Postal Service fans (however few there are) in an uproar and the Apple web, where dramatic news travels fast in a discussion about it ... turning it into a controversy. And whatta you know, it happened.
My guess is ... the whole move by The Postal Service wasn't to actually bring any action against Apple, but exploit the Apple web for some free publicity.
Frankly, the music of The Postal Service stinks ... I listened to all of the clips I could hear at the iTunes Music Store and they sound like a mix between an old Nintendo videogame and Moby's worst remix.
MacObserver is reporting that Postal Service's video has climbed to #1 at the Apple iTunes Music Store:
And finally ... I have to hand it to watchmactv.com for their excellent side by side comparison of the Apple commercial and the music video ... well worth watching.
Conspiracy theorists have started to draw parallels between this and the recent Apple vs Lugz shoes commercial controversy. I actually saw a lot of merit in Lugz claims.
The difference here is:
1) Lugz didn't bring up a bogus controversy up to sell their stuff
2) The Lugz ad significantly predated iTunes silhouette ads
3) The layout of the Postal Service music video and the Apple Intel ad is a VERY common theme using very common imagery and very common zooming effects and other editting techniques
4) Unlike the Lugz ad ... the same director directed BOTH the music video and the Apple ad ... therefore HE is the one who should be in hot water ... if anyone should be scalded ... I mean scolded.
And here's a note to The Postal Service ... in case you didn't know ... you are copying the US Postal Service by using their name.