tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post539181196124333596..comments2007-10-15T14:23:56.935-04:00Philip Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-35739215130317181792007-10-15T14:23:00.000-04:002007-10-15T14:23:00.000-04:00

I'm with Roget ... I've been doing the whole recycling what is GREEN TO RECYCLE and conserving resources and buying recycled just about all of my life. However, I do NOT want to be told what to think and taxed to force me to recycle.<BR/><BR/>Roget is right ... scientists are paid to publish these reports. Greenpeace thrives on the news and sells more bumper stickers.

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-24982703600776870412007-10-15T14:18:00.000-04:002007-10-15T14:18:00.000-04:00

vegancowboy,<BR/>I didn't say what I said just to get a rise out of you. <BR/>I genuinely suspect the motives of some involved in this topic.<BR/><BR/>These scientists are PAID to produce these damning reports. It is in their interest to maintain the scare.<BR/><BR/>I have been 'green' long before it was trendy to be green. I have no doubt that man is making an impact on the planet but I am fed

rogetnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-31031237328509834392007-10-14T15:27:00.000-04:002007-10-14T15:27:00.000-04:00

Actually ... I think I make it pretty clear in the article that I'm not a hypocrit. If I were just "waiting" it out I'd throw away everything without any regard as to whether it could be recycled or not.<BR/><BR/>A scientific consensus on the environment is like a political poll. The results are skewed to say whatever they want the poll to say.<BR/><BR/>MOST SCHOLARS I have spoken to or seen ...

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-75537983318250742772007-10-14T14:12:00.000-04:002007-10-14T14:12:00.000-04:00

Look I finally decided to use a blogger account when posting! Yeah me!. <BR/><BR/>Sorry, the conspiracy comment was more directed as a response to roget's post since he dismissed what I said was a scientific consensus as basically a conspiracy to make money even though most climatologists that have studied the issue aren't profiting in any significant way. I should have been clear who my comment

VeganCowboyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17989281188316101123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-90471517768111368862007-10-14T13:35:00.000-04:002007-10-14T13:35:00.000-04:00

First, if you look at who has edited that Wikipedia article; you find GREENPEACE and several known Greenpeace activists.<BR/><BR/>I do not believe it's a conspiracy either. I think SOME scientists and a LOT of people actually DO THINK man has had an influence on the climate.<BR/><BR/>The ONLY way we could possibly know if these theories are correct is waiting 100 years until say 2050 - (1950

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-52443852086794771642007-10-14T00:18:00.000-04:002007-10-14T00:18:00.000-04:00

Sorry to not have included links. As for the opinion of the scientific community being split I suggest reading <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change" REL="nofollow"> this</A> entry in wikipedia. Please pay attention to the Dissenting Statements section which has the following "With the release of the revised statement by the American Association of Petroleum

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-31597911925468109732007-10-13T11:37:00.000-04:002007-10-13T11:37:00.000-04:00

Exactly Roget ... it's also not MOST scientists ... its about half - whatta you know right along political lines.

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-35518868033444523312007-10-13T11:33:00.000-04:002007-10-13T11:33:00.000-04:00

<I>The reality is the majority of the scientific community agrees that this is indeed a fact. </I><BR/><BR/>Hmm, because their jobs depend on maintaining the GW myth?

rogetnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-85831570611819052572007-10-13T10:58:00.000-04:002007-10-13T10:58:00.000-04:00

Maybe they should rename the film "A Convenient Load Of Bull****"?

roget the recyclernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-85650097772212108732007-10-13T10:56:00.000-04:002007-10-13T10:56:00.000-04:00

Not only have I seen the movie ... I own it on DVD.<BR/><BR/>It's a great lesson in selling something to the public.<BR/><BR/>I've linked to the debunking in this article. Where are your links?

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-40144470934538912872007-10-13T09:09:00.000-04:002007-10-13T09:09:00.000-04:00

I think it is clear that you have not seen the movie since you bring up point that the movie agrees with. But what is better is you use Pen and Teller as your reference to debunk global climate change. The reality is that in every article about global climate change that is been in any peer reviewed scientific journal agrees that the current global climate change is in part caused by humans. The

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-24655654293029451902007-10-12T17:49:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:49:00.000-04:00

Thanks for the heads up ... I had read that aggregated and quoted on another site I believe. Good stuff.

fixyourthinkinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15709596700848616677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-6413004226151788522007-10-12T17:41:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:41:00.000-04:00

By the way, don't know if you read The Devil's Kitchen, but here's a view of this from across the pond: <BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2007/10/nobel-climate-change-preaching-prize.html" REL="nofollow">The Noble Climate Change Preaching Prize.</A>

Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14943495675093285243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7712195.post-49697449290228310002007-10-12T15:26:00.000-04:002007-10-12T15:26:00.000-04:00

Thanks. You just saved me a blog entry.

Tomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14943495675093285243noreply@blogger.com